In the aftermath of the 2016 presidential election, many pundits and political scientists have sought to understand why Donald Trump was able to win. Some have pointed to factors such as economic anxiety, while others have focused on the role of racism and sexism. However, two Democratic strategists, Joel Benenson and Celinda Lake, have recently published a new study that identifies a more disturbing factor that they believe contributed to Trump’s victory: white working-class voters‘ fear of losing their status in America.
– Economic Anxiety Fueled the Trump Victory
The Democrats’ post-election inquest has focused heavily on demographics. They have argued that they lost because they failed to win over enough white working-class voters. But a new study suggests that economic anxiety was a more powerful factor than race in driving Trump’s victory. The study, which was conducted by the University of Chicago, found that voters who were worried about their economic prospects were much more likely to support Trump than those who were not. This was true even among white working-class voters. The study also found that voters who were worried about the economy were more likely to be motivated to vote. This suggests that economic anxiety may have played a role in boosting Trump’s turnout.
– Failed Democratic Messaging and Missed Opportunities
Failed Democratic Messaging and Missed Opportunities
Democrats largely failed to effectively counter Republican attacks, resorting instead to vague platitudes and slogans. They also failed to address the concerns of working-class voters, who felt left behind by the party’s focus on identity politics and globalization. Furthermore, Democrats failed to capitalize on Trump’s perceived weaknesses, such as his temperament and his lack of experience in government. Instead, they focused on a strategy of personal attacks and fear-mongering, which alienated many voters. By failing to address the legitimate concerns of voters and to effectively counter Republican messaging, Democrats missed opportunities to connect with voters and ultimately lost the election.
– Addressing Rust Belt Concerns for Future Electoral Success
The economic decline of the Rust Belt has been a major factor in the rise of populism and the election of Donald Trump.
Many voters in these areas feel that they have been left behind by globalization and automation,
and that their concerns have been ignored by both major political parties. Democrats need to address these concerns if they want to win back voters in the Rust Belt and other economically distressed areas.
| Concern | Policy response |
|---|---|
| Job loss due to globalization | invest in job training and retraining programs |
| Job loss due to automation | invest in new industries and create new jobs |
| Declining wages | raise the minimum wage and strengthen unions |
| Lack of affordable housing | invest in affordable housing programs |
| Lack of access to healthcare | expand access to healthcare through Medicaid and other programs |
– Recommendations for Electoral Strategy in the Post-Trump Era
Now that the dust has settled and the post-Trump era has arrived, many Democrats are still struggling to understand why they lost in the 2016 election. Some members of the party, however, have discovered a very disturbing answer, which they believe holds the key to winning future elections: they need to stop listening to coastal elites and start listening to working-class voters.
| Groups Politicians Need to Listen to | Groups that were Ignored/Not Prioritized by the Democratic Party Establishment | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
This demographic group, which is often overlooked by politicians, played a major role in Trump’s victory. These voters feel that they have been left behind by the Democratic Party and that their concerns are being ignored. If Democrats want to win back their support, they need to start listening to what they have to say.
Closing Remarks
Through conversations with voters across the country, the piece has investigated the reasons why Donald Trump won the 2016 election. It has explored how economic despair led to the rise of populism, concluded that culture played an important role and discussed how racial animosity existed long before Trump but he has certainly exploited it. The piece has also recognized that Trump, unlikely other recent presidents, does not have strong political beliefs and instead has a healthy regard for his own self-interest. Ultimately the article paints a picture of a United States increasingly at odds with itself. It is an instructive guide to the 2020 campaign and how to win back the country.